Optimization of vigabatrin dosage in children with epileptic spasms: A population pharmacokinetic approach.

AIMS: Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug used to treat some forms of severe epilepsy in children. The main adverse effect is ocular toxicity, which is related to the cumulative dose. The aim of the study is to identify an acceptable exposure range, both through the development of a population pharmacokinetic model of vigabatrin in children enabling us to calculate patient exposure and through the study of therapeutic response. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including children with epilepsy followed at Necker-Enfants Malades hospital who had a vigabatrin assay between January 2019 and January 2022. The population pharmacokinetic study was performed on Monolix2021 using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach. Children treated for epileptic spasms were classified into responder and nonresponder groups according to whether the spasms resolved, in order to identify an effective plasma exposure range. RESULTS: We included 79 patients and analysed 159 samples. The median age was 4.2 years (range 0.3-18). A 2-compartment model with allometry and creatinine clearance on clearance best fit our data. Exposure analysis was performed on 61 patients with epileptic spasms. Of the 22 patients who responded (36%), 95% had an AUC0-24 between 264 and 549 mg.h.L-1. CONCLUSIONS: The population pharmacokinetic model allowed us to identify bodyweight and creatinine clearance as the 2 main factors explaining the observed interindividual variability of vigabatrin. An acceptable exposure range was defined in this study. A target concentration intervention approach using this pharmacokinetic model could be used to avoid overexposure in responder patients.

Placebo response in patients with Dravet syndrome: Post-hoc analysis of two clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Dravet syndrome is a rare, early childhood-onset epileptic and developmental encephalopathy. Responses to placebo in clinical trials for epilepsy therapies range widely, but factors influencing placebo response remain poorly understood. This study explored placebo response and its effects on safety, efficacy, and quality of life outcomes in patients with Dravet syndrome. METHODS: We performed exploratory post-hoc analyses of pooled data from placebo-treated patients from the GWPCARE 1B and GWPCARE 2 randomized controlled phase III trials, comparing cannabidiol and matched placebo in 2-18 year old Dravet syndrome patients. All patients had ≥4 convulsive seizures during a baseline period of 4 weeks. RESULTS: 124 Dravet syndrome-treated patients were included in the analysis (2-5 years: n = 35; 6-12 years: n = 52; 13-18 years: n = 37). Convulsive seizures were experienced by all placebo group patients at all timepoints, with decreased median convulsive seizure frequency during the treatment period versus baseline; the number of convulsive seizure-free days was similar to baseline. Convulsive seizure frequency had a nominally significant positive correlation with age and a nominally significant negative correlation with body mass index. Most placebo-treated patients experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event; however, most resolved quickly, and serious adverse events were infrequent. Placebo treatment had very little effect on reported Caregiver Global Impression of Change outcomes versus baseline. INTERPRETATION: Placebo had little impact on convulsive seizure-free days and Caregiver Global Impression of Change versus baseline, suggesting that these metrics may help differentiate placebo and active treatment effects in future studies. However, future research should further assess placebo responses to confirm these results.

Dravet syndrome seizure frequency and clustering: Placebo-treated patients in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Dravet syndrome is a rare developmental epilepsy syndrome associated with severe, treatment-resistant seizures. Since seizures and seizure clusters are linked to morbidity, reduced quality of life, and premature mortality, a greater understanding of these outcomes could improve trial designs. This analysis explored seizure types, seizure clusters, and factors affecting seizure cluster variability in Dravet syndrome patients. METHODS: Pooled post-hoc analyses were performed on data from placebo-treated patients in GWPCARE 1B and GWPCARE 2 randomized controlled phase III trials comparing cannabidiol and placebo in Dravet syndrome patients aged 2-18 years. Multivariate stepwise analysis of covariance of log-transformed convulsive seizure cluster frequency was performed, body weight and body mass index z-scores were calculated, and incidence of adverse events was assessed. Data were summarized in three age groups. RESULTS: We analyzed 124 placebo-treated patients across both studies (2-5 years: n = 35; 6-12 years: n = 52; 13-18 years: n = 37). Generalized tonic-clonic seizures followed by myoclonic seizures were the most frequent seizure types. Mean and median convulsive seizure cluster frequency overall decreased between baseline and maintenance period but did not change significantly during the latter; variation in convulsive seizure cluster frequency was observed across age groups. Multivariate analysis suggested correlations between convulsive seizure cluster frequency and age (positive), and body mass index (BMI) (negative). INTERPRETATION: Post-hoc analyses suggested that potential relationships could exist between BMI, age and convulsive seizure cluster variation. Results suggested that seizure cluster frequency may be a valuable outcome in future trials. Further research is needed to confirm our findings.

Istore: a project on innovative statistical methodologies to improve rare diseases clinical trials in limited populations.

BACKGROUND: The conduct of rare disease clinical trials is still hampered by methodological problems. The number of patients suffering from a rare condition is variable, but may be very small and unfortunately statistical problems for small and finite populations have received less consideration. This paper describes the outline of the iSTORE project, its ambitions, and its methodological approaches. METHODS: In very small populations, methodological challenges exacerbate. iSTORE's ambition is to develop a comprehensive perspective on natural history course modelling through multiple endpoint methodologies, subgroup similarity identification, and improving level of evidence. RESULTS: The methodological approaches cover methods for sound scientific modeling of natural history course data, showing similarity between subgroups, defining, and analyzing multiple endpoints and quantifying the level of evidence in multiple endpoint trials that are often hampered by bias. CONCLUSION: Through its expected results, iSTORE will contribute to the rare diseases research field by providing an approach to better inform about and thus being able to plan a clinical trial. The methodological derivations can be synchronized and transferability will be outlined.

Providing quality care for people with CDKL5 deficiency disorder: A European expert panel opinion on the patient journey.

Cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5) deficiency disorder (CDD) is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy caused by variants in the CDKL5 gene. The disorder is characterized by intractable early-onset seizures, severe neurodevelopmental delay, hypotonia, motor disabilities, cerebral (cortical) visual impairment and microcephaly. With no disease-modifying therapies available for CDD, treatment is symptomatic with an initial focus on seizure control. Another unmet need in the management of people with CDD is the lack of evidence to aid standardized care and guideline development. To address this gap, experts in CDD and representatives from patient advocacy groups from Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom convened to form an Expert Working Group. The aim was to provide an expert opinion consensus on how to ensure quality care in routine clinical practice within the European setting, including in settings with limited experience or resources for multidisciplinary care of CDD and other developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. By means of one-to-one interviews around the current treatment landscape in CDD, insights from the Expert Working Group were collated and developed into a Europe-specific patient journey for individuals with CDD, which was later validated by the group. Further discussions followed to gain consensus of opinions on challenges and potential solutions for achieving quality care in this setting. The panel recognized the benefit of early genetic testing, a holistic personalized approach to seizure control (taking into consideration various factors such as concomitant medications and comorbidities), and age- and comorbidity-dependent multidisciplinary care for optimizing patient outcomes and quality of life. However, their insights and experiences also highlighted much disparity in management approaches and resources across different European countries. Development of standardized European recommendations is required to align realistic diagnostic criteria, treatment goals, and management approaches that can be adapted for different settings. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5) deficiency disorder (CDD) is a rare condition caused by a genetic mutation with a broad range of symptoms apparent from early childhood, including epileptic seizures that do not respond to medication and severe delays in development. Due to the lack of guidance on managing CDD, international experts and patient advocates discussed best practices in the care of people with CDD in Europe. The panel agreed that early testing, a personalized approach to managing seizures, and access to care from different disciplines are beneficial. Development of guidelines to ensure that care is standardized would also be valuable.

Genotype-phenotype associations in 1018 individuals with SCN1A-related epilepsies.

OBJECTIVE: SCN1A variants are associated with epilepsy syndromes ranging from mild genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) to severe Dravet syndrome (DS). Many variants are de novo, making early phenotype prediction difficult, and genotype-phenotype associations remain poorly understood. METHODS: We assessed data from a retrospective cohort of 1018 individuals with SCN1A-related epilepsies. We explored relationships between variant characteristics (position, in silico prediction scores: Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD), Rare Exome Variant Ensemble Learner (REVEL), SCN1A genetic score), seizure characteristics, and epilepsy phenotype. RESULTS: DS had earlier seizure onset than other GEFS+ phenotypes (5.3 vs. 12.0 months, p < .001). In silico variant scores were higher in DS versus GEFS+ (p < .001). Patients with missense variants in functionally important regions (conserved N-terminus, S4-S6) exhibited earlier seizure onset (6.0 vs. 7.0 months, p = .003) and were more likely to have DS (280/340); those with missense variants in nonconserved regions had later onset (10.0 vs. 7.0 months, p = .036) and were more likely to have GEFS+ (15/29, χ2 = 19.16, p < .001). A minority of protein-truncating variants were associated with GEFS+ (10/393) and more likely to be located in the proximal first and last exon coding regions than elsewhere in the gene (9.7% vs. 1.0%, p < .001). Carriers of the same missense variant exhibited less variability in age at seizure onset compared with carriers of different missense variants for both DS (1.9 vs. 2.9 months, p = .001) and GEFS+ (8.0 vs. 11.0 months, p = .043). Status epilepticus as presenting seizure type is a highly specific (95.2%) but nonsensitive (32.7%) feature of DS. SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding genotype-phenotype associations in SCN1A-related epilepsies is critical for early diagnosis and management. We demonstrate an earlier disease onset in patients with missense variants in important functional regions, the occurrence of GEFS+ truncating variants, and the value of in silico prediction scores. Status epilepticus as initial seizure type is a highly specific, but not sensitive, early feature of DS.

Which terms should be used to describe medications used in the treatment of seizure disorders? An ILAE position paper.

A variety of terms, such as "antiepileptic," "anticonvulsant," and "antiseizure" have been historically applied to medications for the treatment of seizure disorders. Terminology is important because using terms that do not accurately reflect the action of specific treatments may result in a misunderstanding of their effects and inappropriate use. The present International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) position paper used a Delphi approach to develop recommendations on English-language terminology applicable to pharmacological agents currently approved for treating seizure disorders. There was consensus that these medications should be collectively named "antiseizure medications". This term accurately reflects their primarily symptomatic effect against seizures and reduces the possibility of health care practitioners, patients, or caregivers having undue expectations or an incorrect understanding of the real action of these medications. The term "antiseizure" to describe these agents does not exclude the possibility of beneficial effects on the course of the disease and comorbidities that result from the downstream effects of seizures, whenever these beneficial effects can be explained solely by the suppression of seizure activity. It is acknowledged that other treatments, mostly under development, can exert direct favorable actions on the underlying disease or its progression, by having "antiepileptogenic" or "disease-modifying" effects. A more-refined terminology to describe precisely these actions needs to be developed.

Transition in epilepsy - A pilot study with patients in and outside of academic centers.

RATIONALE: Epilepsy is a complex condition and seizures are only one part of this disease. The move from pediatric to adult healthcare system proves difficult for many adolescents with epilepsy and their families. The challenges increase when patients have epilepsies associated with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities, autism spectrum disorder, and motor disorders. Knowledge and system gaps may exist between the two systems, adding to the challenges. The main goal of this study is to understand the perception of patients with epilepsy and their families who were preparing to move from pediatric to adult healthcare system or had already moved. METHODS: A survey was distributed to patients/caregivers of patients with epilepsy through patient support groups in North America and in-person through the 2019 Epilepsy Awareness Day at Disneyland. Patients were required to be 12 years or older at the time of the survey and were divided into two groups: those between 12 and 17 years and those 18 years or older. Caregivers answered on behalf of patients who were unable to respond (e.g., intellectual disability). Major components of the survey included demographics, epilepsy details, quality and access to care received in pediatric and adult years, and questions regarding transition and readiness. RESULTS: Responses were received from 58 patients/caregivers of patients with epilepsy from Canada and the United States. In group A (patients between 12 and 17 years), none of the 17-year-old patients were spoken to about transition. Patients (caregivers) with epilepsy and intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) had less time to discuss important things during the transition/transfer phase than patients with normal intelligence. Finally, there was a statistically significant difference observed in access to specialty care reported in the adult years, compared to the years in the pediatric system. In the group B (patients 18 years and older) a) 35 % still visit their family doctor for epilepsy related treatment despite the majority being on 2 or more antiseizure medications (ASMs); b) 27 % of patients in this group were still being followed by their pediatric neurologist; c) one patient received care only through visits to the emergency department; d) only 4 % felt that they received clear instructions during transfer of care such as knowing the name of the adult healthcare practitioner and/or the name of the care institution they were being transferred to. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the lack of appropriate transition to adult healthcare system (AHCS) amongst an unselected group of patients with epilepsy in Canada and United States. An overwhelming majority of patients followed in the community and in academy centers were simply "transferred" to an adult health practitioner, or they remained under the care of pediatricians. Finally, most patients lack access to significant social and medical support after moving to the AHCS.

Natural history of rare diseases using natural language processing of narrative unstructured electronic health records: The example of Dravet syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The increasing implementation of electronic health records allows the use of advanced text-mining methods for establishing new patient phenotypes and stratification, and for revealing outcome correlations. In this study, we aimed to explore the electronic narrative clinical reports of a cohort of patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) longitudinally followed at our center, to identify the capacity of this methodology to retrace natural history of DS during the early years. METHODS: We used a document-based clinical data warehouse employing natural language processing to recognize the phenotype concepts in the narrative medical reports. We included patients with DS who have a medical report produced before the age of 2 years and a follow-up after the age of 3 years ("DS cohort," 56 individuals). We selected two control populations, a "general control cohort" (275 individuals) and a "neurological control cohort" (281 individuals), with similar characteristics in terms of gender, number of reports, and age at last report. To find concepts specifically associated with DS, we performed a phenome-wide association study using Cox regression, comparing the reports of the three cohorts. We then performed a qualitative analysis of the surviving concepts based on their median age at first appearance. RESULTS: A total of 76 concepts were prevalent in the reports of children with DS. Concepts appearing during the first 2 years were mostly related with the epilepsy features at the onset of DS (convulsive and prolonged seizures triggered by fever, often requiring in-hospital care). Subsequently, concepts related to new types of seizures and to drug resistance appeared. A series of non-seizure-related concepts emerged after the age of 2-3 years, referring to the nonseizure comorbidities classically associated with DS. SIGNIFICANCE: The extraction of clinical terms by narrative reports of children with DS allows outlining the known natural history of this rare disease in early childhood. This original model of "longitudinal phenotyping" could be applied to other rare and very rare conditions with poor natural history description.

Interhemispheric Vertical Hemispherotomy: Technique, Outcome, and Pitfalls-A Bicentric Retrospective Case Series of 39 Cases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: When seizure onset affects a whole hemisphere, hemispheric disconnections are efficient and safe procedures. However, both lateral peri-insular hemispherotomy and vertical paramedian hemispherotomy approaches report a failure rate around 20%, which can be explained by residual connections giving rise to persistent seizures. In this study, we present the interhemispheric vertical hemispherotomy (IVH), a technical variation of the vertical paramedian hemispherotomy approach, that aims to increase seizure control avoiding residual connections while exposing the corpus callosum. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of IVH in two centers, with analysis of clinical and MRI data and outcomes. A detailed description of the technique is provided with a video. RESULTS: IVH was performed in 39 children. The mean age at surgery was 7.2 years, and etiologies were as follows: malformations of cortical development (n = 14), Rasmussen's encephalitis (n = 10), stroke (n = 10), post-traumatic (3), and Sturge-Weber Syndrome (2). Hemispheric disconnection was complete on postoperative MRI in 34 cases. There was no mortality, hydrocephalus occurred in one case, and subdural collection occurred in four cases. A second surgery was performed in four cases because of seizure relapse (n = 3) and/or incomplete disconnection on MRI (n = 4). With a mean follow-up of 3.2 years, International League Against Epilepsy class I epilepsy outcome was obtained for 37/39 patients. CONCLUSION: IVH is a safe and effective variation of the vertical approaches for hemispheric disconnection. It allows a good exposure and anatomic control of the corpus callosum, which is a frequent site of incomplete disconnection. IVH may be limited by the thalamic volume and the ventricular size, notably in hemimegalencephaly cases.

Fifteen years of real-world data on the use of vigabatrin in individuals with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate our treatment algorithm for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) used between 2000 and 2018. We initiated vigabatrin (VGB), and steroids were added if the electroclinical response (spasms and electroencephalogram [EEG]) to VGB was not obtained or incomplete. METHODS: Individuals with IESS treated with VGB were recruited from our hospital clinical data warehouse based on electronic health records (EHRs) generated since 2009 and containing relevant keywords. We confirmed the diagnosis of IESS. Clinical, EEG, imaging, and biological data were extracted from the EHRs. We analyzed factors associated with short-term response, time to response, relapse, time to relapse of spasms, and the presence of spasms at last follow-up. RESULTS: We collected data from 198 individuals (female: 46.5%, IESS onset: 6 [4.5-10.3] months, follow-up: 4.6 [2.5-7.6] years, median [Q1-Q3]) including 129 (65.2%) with identifiable etiology. VGB was started 17 (5-57.5) days after IESS diagnosis. A total of 113 individuals were responders (57.1% of the cohort), 64 with VGB alone and 38 with VGB further combined with steroids (56.6% and 33.6% of responders, respectively). Among responders, 33 (29%) experienced relapses of spasms, mostly those with later onset of spasms (p = .002) and those who received VGB for <24 months after spasms cessation compared to a longer duration on VGB (45% vs. 12.8%, p = .003). At follow-up, 92 individuals were seizure-free (46.5% of the whole cohort), including 26 free of therapy (13.1%). One hundred twelve individuals (56.6%) were still receiving VGB, with a duration of 3.2 (1.75-5.7) years. SIGNIFICANCE: Our sequential protocol introducing VGB then adding steroids is an effective alternative to a combined VGB-steroids approach in IESS. It avoids steroid-related adverse events, as well as those from VGB-steroid combination. According to our data, a period of 7 days seems sufficient to assess VGB response and enables the addition of steroids rapidly if needed. Continuing VGB for 2 years may balance the risk of relapse and treatment-induced adverse events.

Molecular EPISTOP, a comprehensive multi-omic analysis of blood from Tuberous Sclerosis Complex infants age birth to two years.

We present a comprehensive multi-omic analysis of the EPISTOP prospective clinical trial of early intervention with vigabatrin for pre-symptomatic epilepsy treatment in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC), in which 93 infants with TSC were followed from birth to age 2 years, seeking biomarkers of epilepsy development. Vigabatrin had profound effects on many metabolites, increasing serum deoxycytidine monophosphate (dCMP) levels 52-fold. Most serum proteins and metabolites, and blood RNA species showed significant change with age. Thirty-nine proteins, metabolites, and genes showed significant differences between age-matched control and TSC infants. Six also showed a progressive difference in expression between control, TSC without epilepsy, and TSC with epilepsy groups. A multivariate approach using enrollment samples identified multiple 3-variable predictors of epilepsy, with the best having a positive predictive value of 0.987. This rich dataset will enable further discovery and analysis of developmental effects, and associations with seizure development in TSC.

Updated clinical recommendations for the management of tuberous sclerosis complex associated epilepsy.

Children with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), may experience a variety of seizure types in the first year of life, most often focal seizure sand epileptic spasms. Drug resistance is seen early in many patients, and the management of TSC associated epilepsy remain a major challenge for clinicians. In 2018 clinical recommendations for the management of TSC associated epilepsy were published by a panel of European experts. In the last five years considerable progress has been made in understanding the neurobiology of epileptogenesis and three interventional randomized controlled trials have changed the therapeutic approach for the management of TSC associated epilepsy. Pre-symptomatic treatment with vigabatrin may delay seizure onset, may reduce seizure severity and reduce the risk of epileptic encephalopathy. The efficacy of mTOR inhibition with adjunctive everolimus was documented in patients with TSC associated refractory seizures and cannabidiol could be another therapeutic option. Epilepsy surgery has significantly improved seizure outcome in selected patients and should be considered early in all patients with drug resistant epilepsy. There is a need to identify patients who may have a higher risk of developing epilepsy and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In the recent years significant progress has been made owing to the early identification of risk factors for the development of drug-resistant epilepsy. Better understanding of the mechanism underlying epileptogenesis may improve the management for TSC-related epilepsy. Developmental neurobiology and neuropathology give opportunities for the implementation of concepts related to clinical findings, and an early genetic diagnosis and use of EEG and MRI biomarkers may improve the development of pre-symptomatic and disease-modifying strategies.

Together4RD position statement on collaboration between European reference networks and industry.

Notwithstanding two decades of policy and legislation in Europe, aimed to foster research and development in rare conditions, only 5-6% of rare diseases have dedicated treatments. Given with the huge number of conditions classed as rare (which is increasing all the time), this equates to major unmet need for patients (over 30 million in the EU alone). Worryingly, the pace of Research and Innovation in Europe is lagging behind other regions of the world, and a seismic shift in the way in which research is planned and delivered is required, in order to remain competitive and-most importantly-bring meaningful, disease-altering treatments to those who desperately need them. The European Reference Networks (ERNs), launched in 2017, hold major potential to alleviate many of these challenges, and more, but only if adequately supported (financially, technically, and via robust policies and infrastructure) to realise that potential: and even then, only if able to forge robust collaborations harnessing the expertise, resources, knowledge and data of all stakeholders involved in rare disease, including Industry. To-date, however, ERN-Industry interactions have been largely limited, for a range of reasons (concerning barriers both tangible and perceived). This Position Statement analyses these barriers, and explains how Together4RD is seeking to move the needle here, by learning from case studies, exploring frameworks for collaboration, and launching pilots to explore how best to plan and deliver multistakeholder interactions addressing real research needs.

Composite endpoints, including patient reported outcomes, in rare diseases.

BACKGROUND: When assessing the efficacy of a treatment in any clinical trial, it is recommended by the International Conference on Harmonisation to select a single meaningful endpoint. However, a single endpoint is often not sufficient to reflect the full clinical benefit of a treatment in multifaceted diseases, which is often the case in rare diseases. Therefore, the use of a combination of several clinically meaningful outcomes is preferred. Many methodologies that allow for combining outcomes in a so-called composite endpoint are however limited in a number of ways, not in the least in the number and type of outcomes that can be combined and in the poor small-sample properties. Moreover, patient reported outcomes, such as quality of life, often cannot be integrated in a composite analysis, in spite of their intrinsic value. RESULTS: Recently, a class of non-parametric generalized pairwise comparisons tests have been proposed, which members do allow for any number and type of outcomes, including patient reported outcomes. The class enjoys good small-sample properties. Moreover, this very flexible class of methods allows for prioritizing the outcomes by clinical severity, allows for matched designs and for adding a threshold of clinical relevance. Our aim is to introduce the generalized pairwise comparison ideas and concepts for rare disease clinical trial analysis, and demonstrate their benefit in a post-hoc analysis of a small-sample trial in epidermolysis bullosa. More precisely, we will include a patient relevant outcome (Quality of life), in a composite endpoint. This publication is part of the European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases (EJP RD) series on innovative methodologies for rare diseases clinical trials, which is based on the webinars presented within the educational activity of EJP RD. This publication covers the webinar topic on composite endpoints in rare diseases and includes participants' response to a questionnaire on this topic. CONCLUSIONS: Generalized pairwise comparisons is a promising statistical methodology for evaluating any type of composite endpoints in rare disease trials and may allow a better evaluation of therapy efficacy including patients reported outcomes in addition to outcomes related to the diseases signs and symptoms.

Fenfluramine in the treatment of Dravet syndrome: Results of a third randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of fenfluramine in the treatment of convulsive seizures in patients with Dravet syndrome. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial enrolled patients with Dravet syndrome, aged 2-18 years with poorly controlled convulsive seizures, provided they were not also receiving stiripentol. Eligible patients who had ≥6 convulsive seizures during the 6-week baseline period were randomized to placebo, fenfluramine .2 mg/kg/day, or fenfluramine .7 mg/kg/day (1:1:1 ratio) administered orally (maximum dose = 26 mg/day). Doses were titrated over 2 weeks and maintained for an additional 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the monthly convulsive seizure frequency (MCSF) during baseline and during the combined titration-maintenance period in patients given fenfluramine .7 mg/kg/day versus patients given placebo. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients were screened, and 143 were randomized to treatment. Mean age was 9.3 ± 4.7 years (±SD), 51% were male, and median baseline MCSF in the three groups ranged 12.7-18.0 per 28 days. Patients treated with fenfluramine .7 mg/kg/day demonstrated a 64.8% (95% confidence interval = 51.8%-74.2%) greater reduction in MCSF compared with placebo (p < .0001). Following fenfluramine .7 mg/kg/day, 72.9% of patients had a ≥50% reduction in MCSF compared with 6.3% in the placebo group (p < .0001). The median longest seizure-free interval was 30 days in the fenfluramine .7 mg/kg/day group compared with 10 days in the placebo group (p < .0001). The most common adverse events (>15% in any group) were decreased appetite, somnolence, pyrexia, and decreased blood glucose. All occurred in higher frequency in fenfluramine groups than placebo. No evidence of valvular heart disease or pulmonary artery hypertension was detected. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this third phase 3 clinical trial provide further evidence of the magnitude and durability of the antiseizure response of fenfluramine in children with Dravet syndrome.

Retrospective chart review study of use of cannabidiol (CBD) independent of concomitant clobazam use in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome.

PURPOSE: This retrospective chart review study (GWEP20052) evaluated plant-derived highly purified cannabidiol (CBD; Epidyolex®; 100 mg/mL oral solution) use without clobazam as add-on therapy in patients aged ≥2 years with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) or Dravet syndrome (DS) enrolled in a European Early Access Program. METHODS: Data were extracted from patient charts covering a period starting 3 months before CBD treatment and concluding after 12 months of CBD treatment, or sooner if a patient discontinued CBD or started clobazam. RESULTS: Of 114 enrolled patients, data were available for 107 (92 LGS, 15 DS) who received CBD without clobazam for ≥3 months. Mean age: 14.5 (LGS) and 10.5 (DS) years; female: 44% (LGS) and 67% (DS). Mean time-averaged CBD dose: 13.54 (LGS) and 11.56 (DS) mg/kg/day. Median change from baseline in seizure frequency per 28 days over 3-month intervals varied from -6.2% to -20.9% for LGS and 0% to -16.7% for DS. Achievement of ≥50% reduction in drop (LGS) or convulsive (DS) seizures at 3 and 12 months: LGS, 19% (n = 69) and 30% (n = 53); DS, 21% (n = 14) and 13% (n = 8). Retention on CBD without clobazam (enrolled set): 94%, 80%, 69%, and 63% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Adverse event (AE) incidence was 31%, most commonly somnolence, seizure, diarrhea, and decreased appetite. Two patients discontinued CBD owing to AEs, and four patients with LGS experienced elevated liver enzymes. CONCLUSION: Results support favorable effectiveness and retention of CBD without concomitant clobazam for up to 12 months in clinical practice.

Targeting shared molecular etiologies to accelerate drug development for rare diseases.

Rare diseases affect over 400 million people worldwide and less than 5% of rare diseases have an approved treatment. Fortunately, the number of underlying disease etiologies is far less than the number of diseases, because many rare diseases share a common molecular etiology. Moreover, many of these shared molecular etiologies are therapeutically actionable. Grouping rare disease patients for clinical trials based on the underlying molecular etiology, rather than the traditional, symptom-based definition of disease, has the potential to greatly increase the number of patients gaining access to clinical trials. Basket clinical trials based on a shared molecular drug target have become common in the field of oncology and have been accepted by regulatory agencies as a basis for drug approvals. Implementation of basket clinical trials in the field of rare diseases is seen by multiple stakeholders-patients, researchers, clinicians, industry, regulators, and funders-as a solution to accelerate the identification of new therapies and address patient's unmet needs.